My immediate response - "Holy smokes we are doing an incredible disservice to students."
My secondary response - "Holy smokes we need to fix this."
My tertiary response - "Slow down smokey."
I operate my life on the theory that nobody will change their behavior unless they are forced to by a change in situation. It's the reason that spouses think they can change their partners and fail. The other person won't change unless they are threatened with losing something valuable. When I was in the classroom I taught as I remembered good teachers teaching, that is, the teachers that I liked best because I learned from them. I was patient, creative, funny (at least I thought so). I found interesting readings, made real world connections, performed simulations but I still missed the mark on many students. I was still the authority in the class not letting the network of learning relationships develop.
The reason was that I always fell back on my experiences in education as a student - the classes I liked and believed were taught well. I emulated those teachers and classes. I wasn't taking what was in front of me - the change in students' ability to network and understanding that we needed a paradigm shift.
To follow my earlier logic, I wasn't forced to change because I didn't see the same students as others in, shall we say, more fortunate locales. Some stats about the last group of students I worked with:
- 94% free/reduced price lunch (high poverty)
- 15% ELL
- 25% of my students had internet access at home
- 45% had access within walking distance
- behavior - I ratcheted down rules and structure to keep behavior problems at a minimum
What I want to take from his session:
- Understand that ubiquitous networks are almost here - everyone will be connected and multi-tasking. We need to harness that idea and work it into class structure not try to prevent it.
- Platform for Participation
- Use the Web 2.0 and 3.0 tools available - collaborative, constructive.
- Ensure students are using the media for communication and collaboration.
- Facilitate - set the stage, direct and let the students learn.
- Despite not wanting to (the tendency is to use an authoritarian system), you need to manage the network of relationships in the class [n(n-1)/2].
Epiphany analyzed. End rant.
Troy,
ReplyDeleteI think your comments are right on the mark. I've been struggling with how to include Wesch's ideas in my dealings with staff here in Edina. They are teaching AP classes, and have content that must be "covered", therefore the "old" model of sage on the stage is the only way.
Besides, to teach the way Wesch does requires a heck of a lot more planning and trust than traditional lecture does.
Last week, Scott McLeod reposted on "So What If Our Schools Don't Prepare Students for the 21st Century?" I think Wesch has the answer why. I just need to convince people of that!